Reason for cover functions in pthread.cc

[Paul K. Fisher]

> From: Chris Faylor, Monday, May 08, 2000 10:51 AM
>
> On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 10:43:31PM -0500, Paul K. Fisher wrote:
> >Is there a reason to keep the cover functions in pthread.cc?
>
> I don't know of any reason for this practice.  It has
> always mystified me.  Do things __pthread_attr_init
> exist in the spec?
No, not that I can see.  These are simply gratuitous.  I'll remove them in
my next patch.

paul