This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-developers@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: access port 127.0.0.1:1052 (cygserver question) <PLEASE REPLY TO THIS ONE>
- From: "Robert Collins" <robert dot collins at syncretize dot net>
- To: "'Conrad Scott'" <Conrad dot Scott at dsl dot pipex dot com>
- Cc: <cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 22:00:01 +1000
- Subject: RE: access port 127.0.0.1:1052 (cygserver question) <PLEASE REPLY TO THIS ONE>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-developers-owner@cygwin.com
> [mailto:cygwin-developers-owner@cygwin.com] On Behalf Of Conrad Scott
> Sent: Thursday, 4 July 2002 7:45 PM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: access port 127.0.0.1:1052 (cygserver question)
> <PLEASE REPLY TO THIS ONE>
>
>
> "Robert Collins" <robert.collins@syncretize.net> wrote:
> > Sounds like the cygserver domain socket was left open
> > (perhaps due to cygserver being forcibly killed),
> > and each process was trying to connect to the cygserver.
>
> Rob,
>
> AFAICS it's simply the presence of the socket file (/tmp/cygdaemo)
> that triggers this behaviour, i.e. it doesn't require anything to go
> wrong to trigger this. You can re-start the machine and the presence
> of the file causes clients to attempt to connect to the daemon.
Yes. I've read the whole thread now. When I wrote that part I was under
the (apparently) mistaken impression that unix domain sockets, like
other sockets, disappear on the last close. Sigh.
Rob