Cygdaemon - planning
Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc.)
lhall@rfk.com
Thu Jul 3 16:30:00 GMT 2003
Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>
>>On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 11:57:28AM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>>
>>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>
>>>>I think Earnie is saying that well-written code would notice the ENOSYS
>>>>error and use alternative solutions at run time.
>>>
>>>Correct, and the cygwin-apps review process would need to consider it
>>>manditory for the package acceptance/upgrade process.
>>
>>But Corinna wasn't necessarily concerned about official cygwin packages,
>>if I am understanding this correctly.
>>
>>(Can you tell that I don't have a really strong opinion on this one way
>>or the other? :-))
>
>
> Me neither. :-)
>
> If the caller doesn't check the return value, then it's not our fault, and thus
> not out problem. :-)
In relative terms of course. Whether "our" fault or not, the list will
be the first place the confused user turns. It behooves us to find a way
to mitigate, if not eliminate, this list noise if at all possible.
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746
More information about the Cygwin-developers
mailing list