key64_t? ino64_t?

[Nicholas Wourms]

cgf@redhat.com wrote:
> On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 07:40:55PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
>>This is important to decide and to code ASAP, to get out 1.5.0 finally.
>>
>>Do we want a 64 bit key_t in Cygwin?  Yes?  No?  Who will do the changes?
> 
> 
> I'd say yes.  The changes should be trivial compared to ino_t.
> 
> 
>>Do we want a 64 bit ino_t in Cygwin?  Yes?  No?  Who will do the changes?
>>(Probably me in this case).
> 
> 
> Did you see my email to cygwin?  I said I had most of the changes done, AFAICT.
> 

I'm buried in a 2 month backlog of mails from the mainlist, which thread 
is this discussed in?  Thanks...

Cheers,
Nicholas