cygwin-developers archive
date index for May, 2009

This is the mail archive of the cygwin-developers mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

May 30, 2009
13:25 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Eric Blake

May 29, 2009
01:56 Re: Bad codegen in pthread_mutex causing 100% cpu spin loop related to inline asm ilockcmpexchg Dave Korn
00:34 Re: upset vs. genini, release-2 hint files Charles Wilson

May 28, 2009
23:02 Re: upset vs. genini, release-2 hint files [Was: Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty] Christopher Faylor
23:01 Re: upset vs. genini, release-2 hint files [Was: Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty] Christopher Faylor
22:52 Re: Bad codegen in pthread_mutex causing 100% cpu spin loop related to inline asm ilockcmpexchg Christopher Faylor
22:06 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Charles Wilson
21:38 Re: Bad codegen in pthread_mutex causing 100% cpu spin loop related to inline asm ilockcmpexchg Dave Korn
18:38 Re: Bad codegen in pthread_mutex causing 100% cpu spin loop related to inline asm ilockcmpexchg Dave Korn
17:48 Re: upset vs. genini, release-2 hint files Charles Wilson
17:38 upset vs. genini, release-2 hint files [Was: Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty] Charles Wilson
16:55 Bad codegen in pthread_mutex causing 100% cpu spin loop related to inline asm ilockcmpexchg Dave Korn

May 15, 2009
15:10 Re: [1.7] Remove the overhead of calling function _jp2uc Corinna Vinschen
14:43 Re: [1.7] Remove the overhead of calling function _jp2uc Christopher Faylor
13:57 [1.7] Remove the overhead of calling function _jp2uc IWAMURO Motonori

May 14, 2009
14:53 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
14:52 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
14:45 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Christopher Faylor
14:42 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Christopher Faylor
13:00 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
12:33 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Earnie Boyd
11:58 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Eric Blake
11:15 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
10:25 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
08:58 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
08:10 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
04:01 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Charles Wilson

May 13, 2009
17:26 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Christopher Faylor
17:25 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
17:20 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
17:18 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
17:10 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Christopher Faylor
17:06 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Christopher Faylor
16:43 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
16:36 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
16:34 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Christopher Faylor
16:16 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Christopher Faylor
12:30 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Earnie Boyd
09:11 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
09:07 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
08:57 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
03:13 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Christopher Faylor
03:03 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Christopher Faylor
01:42 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Eric Blake
01:22 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Christopher Faylor
00:30 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Eric Blake

May 12, 2009
22:23 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Christopher Faylor
20:10 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
19:26 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Charles Wilson
17:45 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
17:29 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
16:58 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Charles Wilson
14:15 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
14:07 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Earnie Boyd
14:06 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
13:51 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Charles Wilson
13:29 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Earnie Boyd
13:21 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
11:54 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Eric Blake
09:41 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
08:37 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
08:13 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
01:51 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Charles Wilson

May 11, 2009
20:18 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Christopher Faylor
18:38 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Earnie Boyd
14:50 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
14:31 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
13:55 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
13:41 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Christopher Faylor
07:32 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen

May 10, 2009
16:31 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Christopher Faylor
12:46 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Earnie Boyd

May 09, 2009
20:25 Re: How to detect a cygwin thread? Christopher Faylor
10:27 How to detect a cygwin thread? Piotr Wyderski

May 08, 2009
12:13 Re: setup/mkpasswd and HOMEDRIVE/HOMEPATH Dave Korn

May 07, 2009
19:10 Re: setup/mkpasswd and HOMEDRIVE/HOMEPATH Larry Hall (Cygwin Developers)
10:18 Re: setup/mkpasswd and HOMEDRIVE/HOMEPATH Corinna Vinschen
04:46 Re: setup/mkpasswd and HOMEDRIVE/HOMEPATH Larry Hall (Cygwin Developers)

May 06, 2009
21:54 Re: setup/mkpasswd and HOMEDRIVE/HOMEPATH Dave Korn
21:41 Re: setup/mkpasswd and HOMEDRIVE/HOMEPATH Larry Hall (Cygwin Developers)
14:37 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
14:03 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Dave Korn
13:46 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
13:39 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Dave Korn
12:05 Re: setup/mkpasswd and HOMEDRIVE/HOMEPATH Corinna Vinschen
07:45 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
07:44 Re: setup/mkpasswd and HOMEDRIVE/HOMEPATH Corinna Vinschen
07:29 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen

May 05, 2009
20:50 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Charles Wilson
18:41 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Earnie Boyd
17:31 Re: setup/mkpasswd and HOMEDRIVE/HOMEPATH Larry Hall (Cygwin Developers)
16:24 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
16:09 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen
15:43 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Earnie Boyd
14:56 setup/mkpasswd and HOMEDRIVE/HOMEPATH Corinna Vinschen
13:17 Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty Corinna Vinschen


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3